Course Title: Evaluating
marketing and risk management strategies
Audience: Young
and beginning farmers/rancher currently operating with a general understanding
of agricultural business strategies looking to broaden their analytical skills thus
improving market and mitigate risks associated with grain and livestock sales. These learners’ prior knowledge should include
a basic knowledge of marketing and risk management terminology and understand
the importance of sound strategies.
Learning Objectives:
Learners will be able to…
- Compare the most prominent marketing and risk management models by discussing the primary strengths and weaknesses of each model.
- Evaluate available marketing and risk management resources (websites, radio shows, podcasts, etc.) used by farmers/ranchers identifying, in their opinion, the top most reliable and user-friendly resources available.
- Create a collaborative online resource using wiki technology to build a living reference document featuring tools used in marketing and risk management strategies associated with grain and livestock sales.
- Establish a defined marketing and risk management strategy built based on sound resources.
Materials Needed: Each learner should have access to a personal
computer and internet source. The
instructor must create a wiki framework with a page dedicated to the top three
marketing and risk management strategies already on the page (titled ‘Strategies’). The framework should include an additional,
incomplete page for ‘Resources’ and ‘Case Studies’
Class Outline and
Methods: This 8-week course will meet once a week for one hour, synchronously
online through a Zoom Meeting. A
financial officer will facilitate a class of learners primarily from the same region
due to regional marketing conditions. The
content will be focused on learners’ experiences and knowledge sharing to
develop a collaborative community.
Week One:
During the first class, the primary
objective is to develop rapport and ease the learners into the online
format. This includes an online
icebreaker, reviewing course objectives, and establishing guidance around online
netiquette.
Learning Activity – Introduce the class
to the concept of collaborative learning and explain the features of a wiki
page. Present the ‘Strategies’ page of
the course wiki and discuss the three strategies already on the page. Ensure each step of the wiki navigation is
done slowly and ‘think out loud’ about the steps taken to edit the wiki. Encourage learners to add any comments or ask
questions as the strategies are discussed.
Finally, challenge the learners to think of other strategies to add to
the page.
Offline work – Ask the learners to
consider the strategies presented. Have
them add additional thought, questions, or challenges to the wiki page for learners
to discuss during the coming week.
Week Two:
Week two focuses on discussing the
strategies presented in the previous session and any additions, challenges, or
questions presented offline. The primary
goal in week two is to define the strengths and weaknesses of each model. Review Group Summary lesson description (West
& West, 2009, p. 73-74)
Learning Activity – After reviewing
edits/additions made the course wiki, the learners will be broken out in to ‘break-out’
rooms in order to look more closely and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of
each model. Each ‘break-out’ rooms will
be open for 15 minutes where each group will have a different model to
evaluate. Learners will then come back
and present their strengths and weaknesses to the full class.
Offline work – Ask the learners to
consider the strengths and weaknesses presented. Consider any additional points to add to the wiki. As them to determine one model they feel is
most relevant to their regional and provide supporting evidence.
Week Three:
The third week begins to shift to
the second objective. During this class,
the learners will start to consider the resources they have available to them
when making marketing and risk management decisions. Review ‘Resource Bank’ lesson description
(West & West, 2009, p. 60-61)
Learning Activity – Spend time
discussing each model and having learners explain which model they preferred
and why. Explain that the next step is
to understand the tools available to farmers/ranchers to make marketing and risk
management decisions. Discuss the importance
of evaluate where the source of information and the possible influences (i.e.-political,
financial, regional) on the data. Brainstorm a list of current tools the
learners are using or have heard about.
Ask a learner to lead the documentation of the resources on the ‘Resources’
page in the course wiki.
Offline work – Ask the learners to
pick one of the resources discussed in the class and dive deep into the
content. Consider the source of data,
reliability, and positive/negative influences that might impact the
reporting. Ask the learners to rate the
source reviewed and report their opinion on the wiki.
Week Four:
At this point, the wiki is starting
to fill up with data, but the data needs more editing eyes. This week will be used to add more resources to
this page (if any were missed) and then collaborate to review and evaluate all
sources provided.
Learning Activity – After adding
any additional resources not provided by the learners last week, discuss which
sources the learners decided to review offline.
Challenge the learners to seek concurrence. Discuss which ‘deep dive’ strategies were
most effective. Explain that the class
will now go to ‘break-out’ rooms to discuss the evaluation of a group of
resources. Assign each group equal but
different sources. Instruct them to add and
edit the review notes already made on each resource. Upon returning from the ‘break-out’ rooms, work
collaboratively to classify each resource into one of three categories;
reliable, proceed with caution, or unreliable.
Offline work – Ask the learners to
create a plan for integrating a regular resource review process. This might mean subscribing to their favorite
podcast and putting a reminder on their phone when the radio show they want to
listen to is on. The idea is to create a
habit while the ‘scaffolding’ is still in place.
Week Five:
During this week, the objective shift
away from building a wiki in order to delve into the concepts collected and
analyze how they apply to the learner’s farming/ranching operation.
Learning Activity – During this class,
the learners will have a guest speaker with an expertise in the grain or
livestock focus on the region. Learners
will be asked to consider how the models and resources compliment or contradict
the message from the guest. The guest
will be provided information about the resources explored prior to the meeting
to be prepared to provide a professional opinion on the source. The focus of this activity is to bridge the
gap from the source to the application of the information.
Offline work – Ask the learners to consider
a farmer/rancher in the area that has been successful in marketing and risk
management. Using pseudonyms, as the
learners to briefly describe the operator and why they think this individual
has been successful. Add this
information to the wiki. Contact the
operator inquire if they would be willing to meet or have a phone call to share
some insights into marketing and risk management that they will share back with
the class.
Week Six:
At this point, the learners should
be comfortable with the strategies, resources, and concepts behind marketing and
risk management. These final three weeks
will focus on establishing a strategy that is right for the learner’s
operation. This week specifically they
will be looping in strategies from successful operation in the region. See ‘Case Studies’ lesson description (West
& West, 2009, p. 82-84)
Learning Activity – Present, using a
pseudonym, the profile of the farmer/rancher selected and discuss why they pick
the operator. At this point, ask the
learners to consider which strategy they believe that operators may be using and
if their success is luck or strategy.
Offline work – Ask the learners to
interview the operator selected focusing on unveiling insights and resources
used to help them make good decisions.
Consider instances when the operator wasn’t successful in marketing and
risk management. Do they have any suggestions
for building a sound strategy? Add
interview note to the wiki in on the ‘Case Study’ page.
Week Seven:
The evaluation of the case studies
will help learners find commonalities between the different success stories. This week the learners will glean those sound
strategies from the case studies and work to apply them to their operation.
Learning Activity – Use ‘break-out’
rooms to divide the group into smaller subgroups of 3-4 learners. Each learner should present their case study
to the group focusing on what strategies were successful. After each learner present to the small group,
each group should identify common strategies or resources. In the large group, each small group will
present their common strategies or resources focusing on explaining why they
are the best tools. After giving each
group time to debate, add notes to the resources about any additional features
that may not already be documented there.
Offline work – Diagram a working
marketing and risk management strategy for the next year. Establish milestone to level check current
market conditions throughout the year. Include
time to review resources and modify the plan.
Week Eight:
This final class will provide one
last opportunity to set the learners up for success over the next year. The goal is to establish an understanding that
this learning community and wiki don’t end because our course is ending. Invite the class to continue to collaborate
and share their successes.
Learning Activity – Pair and Share the
strategies developed offline. Encourage
peers to add more details or consider missing steps. Wrap up the course with reminders about
continuing collaboration opportunities.
Evaluation: The course evaluation will include a survey
at the end of the course with learners reporting their experience during the course
as well as their intention to use the wiki as a reference and the strategies
developed. A second evaluate will be
conducted 6 months and 12 months after course completion. A sampling of the learners will be called to discuss
the application of the learning and determine if the course, in fact, improved
their ability to market and manage risk.
References:
West, J. and
West, M. (2009). Using Wikis for online collaboration: The power of the
read-write Web. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 9780470343333
Useful lesson plan
resource:
Diamond,
R. (2008). Designing and assessing courses and curricula. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
Hi Carli,
ReplyDeleteI like the ‘offline work’ section you included in each week of your lesson plan. You incorporated appropriate curriculum content into the learning processes throughout the eight weeks, and utilized a technological approach to the instruction. Harris & Hofer (2011) discuss the how to effectively integrate educational technologies into instruction, “teachers’ planning must occur at the nexus of curriculum requirements, students’ learning needs, available technologies’ affordances and constraints, and the realities of school and classroom contexts’ (p. 211). By clearly outlining the activity for the week and summarizing the outside / offline work that needs to be conducted, you have planned for the appropriate integration of technology into the pedagogical curriculum.
Reference
Harris, J.B. & Hofer, M.J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229.
Thanks for the feedback Sara! Harris and Hofer (2011) hit the nail on the head. I've found that finding that balance between students' needs and the real life is one of the most challenging calculations to make. Every day, adults decide if they are going to show up to our class and having balanced those four elements just right is the key. Great resource and thanks for sharing!
ReplyDeleteThis is building a genuine consensus (Habermas, 1981; Habermas, 1991)! Habermas describes a community in which there is an ideal speech situation, meaning that everyone has equal input and all are listened to. It also means that the marginal population has a voice. I was raised in small town USA and this class description has been an interesting visual for me. I realize this generation of farmers and ranchers are technology natives, and that communication via device is their life, but I am imagining how that looks are the farm/ranch. They will be checking their devices as they work during the day, provided they can get internet. They may be discussing, arguing, and agreeing as they search their wikis, with the intention of coming to a genuine consensus. Such an interesting wiki you have created!
ReplyDeleteHabermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action [Kindle version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere. (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.) Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
I really appreciate your lesson plan. It is very clean and has lots of details. I think anyone that is learning something new appreciates when a topic is clear and has details. Anyone exposed to a new topic or area of information can learn a lot faster if the main point or focus is well explained. You did an amazing job with information provided and showing the key points of your plan. I really appreciate the information and I was able to learn how to create a good plan for my future students. Great post.
ReplyDelete